Posted on

“Vaccine Injury Compensation Modernization Act of 2026”

28 July 2026 |  ZeroNotification.com | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com| Image source | Proposed legislation, H.R. 9672, the ‘‘Vaccine Injury Compensation Modernization Act of 2026,’’ updates the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by increasing compensation, adding provisions for legal representation and appeals, increasing manufacturers vaccine tax from $.75 per vaccine to $2.20 per vaccine, and expanding Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) filing window from three years to five years.

To amend the Public Health Service Act to make updates to the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and for other purposes.

Link to Full Document

 

 

Voters may call Representatives to vote Yes on H.R. 9672–Congressional contact information may be found HERE.

 


 

Posted on

The Unvaccinated (2026)

31 May 2026 | ZeroNotification.com  | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com | By Unbekoming – Source | New Book by Unbekoming: What a Forbidden Comparison Reveals About the True Cost of Vaccination

Source

There is one study that would end the argument about childhood vaccination, and it has never been done. Take a large group of children given the full schedule, take a comparable group given none of it, and follow both for years across every measure of health. The design is simple, the groups exist, and the question is the most important one in pediatric medicine. It is also the one comparison the system cannot afford to run, which is why running it has been declared unethical.

The comparison ran itself anyway. Joy Garner’s Control Group Survey gathered health data on completely unexposed Americans across forty-eight states and found a chronic-condition rate of 2.64 percent. The general population, almost entirely exposed to the schedule, carries chronic conditions at roughly 60 percent. That gap is the subject of this book.

THE BOOK — The Unvaccinated makes the case against the childhood schedule completely, and on the establishment’s own ground: what is actually in the injections, the legal architecture that removed liability and let the schedule expand, the financial machinery that pays compliance, and the buried history showing that the great killers had already retreated by ninety-five to ninety-eight percent before the injections arrived. A reader who goes no further than the safety case will already have lost their illusions about the schedule.

But the safety case, on its own, leaves the foundation standing — and the foundation is where the real corruption lives.

THE TRAP MOST OF THIS SPACE IS STILL IN — Almost everyone who fights vaccination fights it on safety, and almost everyone does it while standing inside an assumption neither side examines: that the diseases are caused by transmissible viral particles a properly made product could defend against. Grant that, and the whole argument shrinks to a dispute about dosage.

I’ll be plain about this, because the book is. Much of the writing collected here, including some of my own, was done when I was still inside that frame. The safety points are sound and I’ve left them as they were. That a case against vaccination could persuade people who still believed in viruses, who accepted contagion without question, tells you how strong the safety evidence is. But persuading someone inside the frame is not the same as freeing them from it. Virology is the problem that vaccination was built to solve, and both are scientifically corrupt. It’s time everyone still working in this space did that deeper part of the work.

INSIDE — THE FIVE APPENDICES

Appendix 1 — The Refusal Toolkit. The prepared, wave-by-wave guide the delivery-room encounter is designed to defeat: what to print and bring, what the pressure sounds like at each stage from the casual assumption of consent through the turn to the mother to the threat of Child Protective Services, what is actually true underneath each wave, and how to answer without being drawn into a debate you were never meant to win.

Appendix 2 — What’s Actually in the Vial. The contents, named one substance at a time with their amounts. The vitamin K “vitamin” whose inactive ingredients outweigh the active one by more than fifty to one, the aluminium that accumulates in tissue and does not clear, the surfactant chosen for its ability to open the barrier that protects the brain, and the manufacturers’ own admission that none of it has been tested for cancer, mutation, or fertility effects.

Appendix 3 — The Legal Architecture: A Timeline. The protections laid out as a dated spine, from the 1969 warfare-program language through the 1986 liability shield to the 2022 court filing in which Pfizer reclassified its product as a Department of Defense prototype to which the ordinary rules did not apply. The same product, a vaccine in the messaging and a military prototype in the filing.

Appendix 4 — The Terrain Reading of the Schedule. What injection actually does, described in terms of what the body is rather than the military metaphor of defence and attack: Richet’s Nobel-honoured finding that injecting foreign protein sensitises rather than protects, the persistence of the metal load, and the slide from acute clearing into chronic management that Shelton mapped a century ago.

Appendix 5 — The Question Underneath. The piece no other book in this space writes. A tight executive summary of the case against virology and contagion: what “isolation” actually means and why it proves nothing, what the tests really detect, and the transmission experiments — Rosenau’s among them, 161 volunteers during the deadliest outbreak on record, a 1.2 percent rate of illness — that were designed to confirm contagion and failed. It ends by handing you the full case in No Virus, chapter by chapter.


 

WHY THIS ONE IS FREE — This book is not behind the paywall. Every subscriber gets it. The people who most need to read it are the ones still arguing about dosage while standing on a foundation that was never sound, and a paywall is the last thing that should sit between them and the argument. If it lands for you, send it to the person you know who is halfway out and doesn’t yet have the words for the rest of the way.

 


 

IF YOU WANT TO GO ALL THE WAY DOWN — Appendix 5 is the summary. No Virus is the full reckoning: the isolation studies, the failed contagion experiments, and the disease-by-disease examination of influenza, the childhood illnesses, measles, polio, HIV/AIDS, and COVID. It sits in the paid library alongside the rest of the work — the cancer compendium, the screening books, the heart-disease and genetics titles. The free book shows you the floor giving way. The library is where you find out how far down it goes.

The unvaccinated are not a fortunate minority who gambled and won. They are the evidence that the thing we were told was natural was done to us. Read it, and then decide how deep you want to look.

The Unvaccinated Book V1
6.66MB ∙ PDF file

Download


Posted on

Passed: TX HB 3441 Relating to liability of vaxx manufacturers

 

8 August 2025 |  ZeroNotification.com | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com | Act takes effect September 1, 2025. Texas House Bill 3441 – Relating to the liability of vaccine manufacturers that advertise a harmful vaccine.

 A manufacturer is liable to an individual if:

(1)  the manufacturer advertises a vaccine in this state; and

(2)  the advertised vaccine causes harm or injury to the individual.

(c)  Notwithstanding any other law, an individual may bring an action under this section not later than the third anniversary of the date the cause of action accrues.

(d)  A court shall award a claimant who prevails in an action brought under this section:

(1)  actual damages; and

(2)  court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in bringing the action.

Source

 


 

Posted on

mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act

12 April 2025 | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com | Minnesota House Bill 3152 Introduced.

A bill for an act​ relating to health; prohibiting the administration of gene-based vaccines; providing​ a penalty; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 144.

Link To H.F. 3152

 


 

“The only path to victory for any states’ legislative efforts is recognizing that mRNA injections and products are in fact biological and technological weapons in violation of a state’s bioweapon law. That wipes away all liability shields and claims of protections.”  -Dr. Joeseph Sansone

Link To Mrna_Bioweapons_Prohibition_Act_Sample_Bill

Link To Joseph Sansone Substack

 


 

 

Source

 


 

Posted on

Involuntary Hospitalization Bill Introduced in DC

29 April 2024 |  In what seems reminiscent of NY Governor’s push for quarantine camps, DC Councilmembers have introduced measures which would allow for involuntary hospitalization.

Also known as involuntary commitment or civil commitment, involuntary hospitalization “is the legal process that mandates an individual to enter a hospital or psychiatric facility without their consent, temporarily, for mental health evaluation and treatment.”

Could mental health become weaponized to detain and drug individuals based on the assessment of an “expert?” Much wider public scrutiny of this legislation is warranted.

This legislation could open the door to massive abuse

Link To Document HERE

 

“The bill proposes broadening the pool of qualified healthcare professionals authorized to initiate involuntary commitment
processes, incorporating Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioners who are recognized for their expertise in mental health assessments.”

Many people are aware of efforts by the WHO  to mandate “health” protocols, and rightfully so.  Let’s continue  to monitor and challenge legislation in our nation, as policymakers at home have not been so faithful in protecting our Constitution and God-given rights.

A public hearing on B25-0692 is to be held in July.

 


 

Related

New Yorkers Uniting to Stop Governor’s Quarantine Camps

 


 

Posted on

Legal Remedies for “Cloud-Seeding” Activities

November 21, 2023 | ZeroGeoEngineering.com |1960 Duke Law Journal article examines cases addressing the question of liability for “cloud-seeding”.

In the decision of Southwest Weather Research, Inc. v. Duncan, “The court’s holding that the plaintiffs have rights in the water in the clouds is based on the common-law doctrine of natural rights.8 The landowner is said to have the right to the reasonable use and enjoyment of his land in its natural condition, free from the interference of others.
The activities of the defendants, in depriving’ the plaintiffs of the natural amount of rainfall, violated one of their natural rights and gave them a right of action in equity.10”

The article discusses subsequent cases which established precedent that “landowners are entitled to legal protection from “cloud-seeding” which constitutes an unreasonable interference with their right to natural precipitation.”

 


 

Legal Remedies for “Cloud-Seeding” Activities: Nuisance or Trespass? (1960). Duke Law Journal, 1960(2), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/1370980

 

Link to Full Article HERE

Legal Remedies for Cloud-Seeding Activities Nuisance or Trespass 1960

 


 

CIA Weather

 

Forest Fire As A Military Weapon

 

National Weather Modification Policies and Programs

 

Weather Control Policy in U.S. States

 


 

Related

CLOUD SEEDING – The technology of fraud and deceit

Legal Response to Environmental Concerns about Weather Modification

The Governing of the Air: A Case Study in the Chinese Experience

Enhancing the weather: governance of weather modification activities in Australia

Governance of Weather Modification Activities of the United States

Europe – Solar Radiation Modification: Governance of Research

 


 

To learn more about advocating for legislation to prohibit weather modification, cloud seeding, and other atmospheric/environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 

 


 

Posted on

FY2024 DoE Congressional Funding Request for Biological and Environmental Research

October 15, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | DoE FY2024 Congressional Request |

U.S. policy provides for funding and coordination of weather engineering activities. 

According to The National Weather Modification Policy Act of 1976 (P.L. 94-490), the U.S. Secretary of Commerce and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other government agencies are authorized to engage in atmospheric and weather modification research and in international atmospheric science activities.

There currently exists no regulatory oversight or public consent for weather engineering programs, though several USA States – Connecticut, Illinois, and Rhode Island, introduced legislation this year that would prohibit intentional atmospheric polluting activities, including solar radiation modification (SRM).

The Department of Energy (DoE) FY2024 Congressional Request includes appropriations for studies on atmospheric physics and chemistry involving clouds and aerosols.

Far more public scrutiny and regulatory oversight is essential, as scientific, military, and classified research is not yet subject to safety regulations or appropriate ethical constraints.

As President Eisenhower warned in his farewell address to Americans, “Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

 


 

DOE FY 2024 Budget Request Vol 5 Science (energy.gov)

 

 

 

Link To Full Document HERE

 


 

 

RELATED

Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management   June 2023

Solar Geoengineering Congressional Report May 2023

2010 Geoengineering GAO Report

The cost of stratospheric aerosol injection through 2100

Geoengineering Map

National Weather Modification Programs and policy – 1978 Report

BIOETHICS.TECH

 


 

 

MORE CONTEXT

Advancing Precipitation Enhancement in California 2024

Weather and Climate Modification

 

Weather Control Policy in U.S. States

 

Meteorology, Climate Control, and Rebranding The Federal Weather Enterprise

 

National Weather Modification Policies and Programs

 

Aurora Flight Sciences – Geoengineering Cost Analysis

 

White House Announces Solar Radiation Modification Plan to Block the Sun

 

Weather Engineering by Artificial Satellites

 

Despite consensus narratives, there is no climate emergency

 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

 

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

 

Depopulation Club: The Story of the Committee of 300

 

When will policymakers and POTUS candidates denounce UN Agenda 21/2030?

 


 

To learn more about how to get involved in advocacy for legislation to prohibit weather engineering and other atmospheric / environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com 

 


 

Posted on

Help Push DC Policymakers to Pass WHO Withdrawal Act

October 14, 2023 | WHO Withdrawal Act   H.R. 79 | Demand Congress STOP FUNDING and EXIT the United Nations (UN) World Health Organization (WHO)– Send Message to DC Policymakers HERE

The World Health Organization (WHO) is one of the many UN agencies that the U.S. is funding. According to the April 26, 2023, Congressional Research Report, “The United States is the single largest financial contributor to the United Nations (U.N.) system.” China is the second largest funder of the UN, and Japan is the third largest funder.

China is busy strengthening ties with the UN WHO in attempting to implement global “health” policy.

NOTE: The CDC is a for profit agency acting in partnership with China’s CDC and the WHO.

Americans will recall that U.S. policymakers implemented China-WHO-CDC protocols during the CV19 event. In case anyone missed it, depopulation (acceleration of fertility decline) is a UN priority.

So far, 53 members of the HOUSE have Sponsored or Co-sponsored H.R. 79 and ZERO Senators have introduced or supported the effort to withdraw from the WHO.

Contact your U.S. Representatives and Senators, to urge them to defund and withdraw from the UN WHO!  Send Message HERE

 

Stop the WHO Power Grab 

WHO Withdrawal Act (H.R. 79)

No Taxpayer Funding for the World Health Organization Act (H.R. 343)

No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act (S. 444)

Contact your U.S. Representatives and Senators, to urge them to defund and withdraw from the WHO!  Send Message HERE

 

 


 

 

Related

Contact Congressmembers Today to Demand USA Exit the WHO

 

Why are leading POTUS candidates embracing United Nations WHO policies?

 

When will policymakers and POTUS candidates denounce UN Agenda 21/2030?

 

EXIT and DEFUND the W.H.O.

 

Exit and Defund the UN

 

Depopulation Club: The Story of the Committee of 300

 

1981: Pandemic Genocide Predicted by Globalist Banker

 


 

More context

U.S.-UN-WHO-China-CDC Partnership

1974 Kissinger Report

The Amazing Deception 

There is never going to be another “deadly global pandemic.” There have not been any in the past.


 

Posted on

Why are leading POTUS candidates embracing United Nations WHO policies?

October 10, 2023 | Depopulation is a United Nations Agenda 

Both the Trump and Biden administrations adopted United Nations (UN) World Health Organization (WHO)-China protocols as their CV19 strategy.

When asked how he would address the next pandemic, Robert Kennedy Jr. stated that he would follow the pandemic protocols from the WHO and the CDC.

It is not the government’s job to protect our health. It is the government’s job to protect our rights (and our borders, including airspace). 

WHO-China protocols are presented in the Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which states: “The Joint Mission consisted of 25 national and international experts from China, Germany, Japan, Korea, Nigeria, Russia, Singapore, the United States of America and the World Health Organization (WHO).”

The collaboration of national governments in following the exact same CV19 program was not an accident, but a pre-planned event.

Related

The Amazing Deception

Image Source

 

More pandemics are planned, including The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028, brought to us by: The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

Link To Full Document_SPARS-Pandemic-Scenario

 

The United Nations and the WHO are corrupt organizations, and the CDC is a for profit corporation that has been in partnership with China for over 30 years.

It is necessary to defund and withdraw from the WHO and the UN, shut down the CDC, and prosecute those who are responsible for CV19 crimes against humanity.

 


 

For more perspective on the deliberate sidestepping of the U.S. Constitutional legal system into the implementation of UN WHO International Health Regulations (IHR), writer and paralegal at Bailiwick News, Katherine Watt provides documentation in The American Domestic Bioterrorism Program, HERE.

Ms. Watt’s recent article on this topic states:

International law foundations that currently authorize governments to torture and kill people with legal impunity (by blocking civil and criminal prosecution) include treaties such as the 1946 treaty establishing the World Health Organization, and 2005 amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations that entered into force in 2007.

National governments around the world have adopted domestic laws to implement the WHO-IHR. The coordinated global Covid-19 programs rendered those domestic laws, and the triggering WHO-IHR provisions, more visible.

In the United States, implementing statutes include 21 USC 360bbb (“expanded access to unapproved therapies and diagnostics,” also known as the Emergency Use Authorization program) and 42 USC 247d, “public health emergencies.”

Key pillars of these two American legal structures were enacted by members of Congress and signed into law by then-President George W. Bush: Project Bioshield Act in 2004 and Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act in 2005 (Division C: last 14 pages of DoD Emergency Supplemental Appropriations bill post-Hurricane Katrina). Both programs have been expanded and developed further through amendments adopted since 2005.

 

Link To PDF Compilations – by Katherine Watt

Dec. 2022 nutshell version

January 2023 abstract for an academic paper

 

American Domestic Bioterrorism Program – by Katherine Watt 

Link To Video

Click here for the document describing the kill box:
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2023/01/kill-box-presentation-1.pdf

 

 


 

MORE CONTEXT

BY IAIN DAVIS

“The Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P) is a worldwide network of stakeholder capitalists and their partners. This collective of stakeholders (the capitalists and their partners) comprises global corporations (including central banks), philanthropic foundations (multi-billionaire philanthropists), policy think tanks, governments (and their agencies), non-governmental organisations, selected academic and scientific institutions, global charities, labour unions and other chosen “thought leaders.”  Source

Link To Source HERE

 


 

Related

Vaccine Bait & Switch: As Millions Pulled From WHO, Trump Gives Billions To Gates-Founded GAVI Link To Article

 Biden Gives $4 BILLION to WHO and Bill Gates for Global COVID Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Link To Article

Next Plandemic: Marburg

Is Marburg the next Pl@ndemic

As planned, Marburg Emerges

Is your city following Agenda 2030 instead of following the Constitution?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Image source

 

Posted on

August 2023 Report – Injecting Aerosols for SAI

September 25, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Report |According to authors of a recent report Optimizing injection locations relaxes altitude-lifetime trade-off for stratospheric aerosol injection, “Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) is the deliberate introduction of aerosols or aerosol precursors into the stratosphere,” in an attempt to block sunlight and manipulate Earth’s temperature.

The activity of SAI is based upon climate hypothesis, now disputed by over 1,000 scientists as being politically, not scientifically driven, based on a globalist agenda.

In ongoing government sponsored academic programs to contaminate the air with aerosol pollution, there is no consideration of adverse SAI health and environmental impacts. Authors reference estimated aerosol injection of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) at 1 Teragram per year – Tera denotes a factor of a trillion / 1,000,000,000,000 grams.

 

Related

The cost of stratospheric aerosol injection through 2100

 

To protect life on Earth, the current and long-standing policy allowing for funding and coordinating of SAI (aka environmental warfare) must be abolished and the activity of engineering weather and climate, prohibited. 

 


 

Sun, H., Bourguet, S., Eastham, S., & Keith, D. (2023). Optimizing injection locations relaxes altitude-lifetime trade-off for stratospheric aerosol injection. Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL105371. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105371

1 School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA,

2 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA,

3 Laboratory for Aviation and the Environment, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA,

4 Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA,

5 Department of the Geophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

Link To Article HERE

Geophysical Research Letters – 2023 – Sun

 


 

 

What can be done to ban weather engineering and other hazardous emissions:

Regulatory measures at the state and national level can be enacted and implemented to prohibit weather manipulation and the release of hazardous emissions in our skies and at ground level.

Mexico banned Solar Geoengineering experimentation in January 2023.

PennsylvaniaMaryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting and preventing cloud seeding and weather modification activities. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.

The Atmosphere Protection Act was introduced in Rhode Island in 2023 to prohibit deliberate polluting activities in the atmosphere and at ground level, including both aerosol injection and RF/MW Radiation.

Legislation to tackle geoengineering and weather modification pollution was also introduced in Connecticut and Illinois this year.

Take Action HERE

 

 

To learn more about advocating for laws to prohibit weather modification, geoengineering, and other atmospheric/environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 

 


 

Related

Are Directed Energy Weapons and Geoengineering Triggering Explosive Fires? 

More Evidence Suggests Directed Energy Weapons Caused Fires in Maui 

Despite consensus narratives, there is no climate emergency

How Geoengineering and “5G” are Linked 

What is the impact of satellites covering the Earth with Radiation? 

Weather Warfare Conceals Climate & C0v*d Crimes 

How electromagnetic weapons induce disease and mentally disable entire populations

NATO and the Militarization of 5G 

Military leading the charge on 5G 

Unless Peace Comes – How to Wreck the Environment | A Scientific Forecast of New Weapons • 1968 

Technology Convergence 2035: Humanity vs. AI 

Depopulation Club: The Story of the Committee of 300 

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

Fire Starters 

A Cognitive Model for Exposition of Human Deception and Counterdeception

The Amazing Deception 

Rockefeller’s War On Humanity: UN Agenda 21/2030 & The New World Order 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]