12 December 2025 |   ZeroNotification.com | Medscape article discusses use of Wi-Fi as invisible sensor to track human bodies. This capability aligns with Artificial Intelligence systems built upon 5G-6G wireless systems  and the Internet of Bodies (IOB). Use of continuous Wi-Fi surveillance raises important questions regarding individual privacy, data security, safety, and informed consent.

*An electrocardiogram (ECG or EKG) is a non-invasive test that records the electrical activity of the heart.

By Christina Szalinski

“Wi-Fi signals already fill our homes, offices, and hospitals — invisible waves constantly transmitting data between routers and countless devices. Now researchers are exploring how ubiquitous signals could serve a secondary purpose in healthcare.

The concept is surprisingly straightforward: As Wi-Fi signals transmit through a room, they encounter human bodies and bounce off them in predictable patterns. These subtle disturbances in the signal can reveal movement, breathing patterns, and even heartbeats. Like invisible sonar constantly pinging through our spaces, Wi-Fi creates a field of information that, when properly decoded, can track the rhythms of human life.

“Wi-Fi signals can work as sensors, transparent sensors that you don’t see,” said Katia Obraczka, PhD, engineering professor at University of California at Santa Cruz. “Given that Wi-Fi is such widespread technology — you have Wi-Fi all over the place — it’s very convenient to use it to measure different things.”

For healthcare settings, this technology could address persistent challenges. Hospital patients who remove monitoring devices, elderly residents who forget to wear fall detection pendants, or children who won’t tolerate sleep study equipment might all be monitored through existing Wi-Fi infrastructure.

Emergency departments could assess breathing rates in waiting rooms, while rehabilitation centers might track mobility patterns without attaching sensors to patients. A triage station could obtain ECG measurements while patients simply wait in chairs. The technology promises continuous, passive monitoring without the compliance issues, skin irritation, or battery life concerns of wearable devices.

Obraczka and her team developed a system called Pulse-Fi, which extracts heart rate data from ambient Wi-Fi signals. “We know the frequency range of the heart as it beats, so we extract those frequencies, and then we have a very simple machine learning model that learns and estimates the heart rate,” explained Obraczka. Their initial studies show heart rate measurements within clinical standards.

“It’s an exciting example of how emerging technologies can make health monitoring more accessible and affordable,” said Eugene Yang, MD, cardiology professor at University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, about Pulse-Fi.

While Pulse-Fi focuses on heart rate, researchers can measure multiple health parameters using Wi-Fi simultaneously by analyzing different patterns in signal disturbances. Qammer Abbasi, PhD, engineering professor at University of Glasgow, explained that the heartbeat creates tiny, rapid vibrations, whereas breathing produces larger, slower movements. Falls, body movements, and sleep pattern changes create even bigger displacements—each leaving its own signature in the Wi-Fi field.

Jon Cooper, PhD, bioengineering professor at University of Glasgow, Scotland, is developing Wi-Fi devices that act as activity sensors to detect whether someone is sitting, lying, standing, or walking. This capability could help monitor rehabilitation progress or detect when elderly patients attempt to leave their beds unassisted.

Beyond Wi-Fi, similar wireless technologies offer unique advantages. 5G networks, which operate differently than Wi-Fi by using licensed cellular frequencies managed by carriers rather than local routers, can better penetrate walls and obstacles. “This allows monitoring of small body movements with good range and coverage, supporting continuous, real-time observation of human health and activity in indoor and cluttered environments,” said Muhammad Imran, PhD, communications systems professor at University of Glasgow, Scotland.

Another promising approach uses multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technology, which employs multiple antennas to send and receive data simultaneously — the same technology that makes modern Wi-Fi faster and more reliable. MIMO’s use of multiple signal paths creates a richer dataset for health monitoring. Cooper, Imran, and Abbasi previously explored whether MIMO technology could detect drowsy drivers by measuring heart rate and respiration. They found it was 81% accurate in detecting driver fatigue.

Cooper noted that these wireless technologies have privacy advantages over camera-based monitoring since it’s not actually “seeing” people — only detecting their physical presence and movements through signal patterns.

“However, these technologies also come with challenges, such as the need for proximity to the device and potential interference or congestion from multiple users and neighboring networks,” said Yang.

While Wi-Fi works through walls, Obraczka’s team has only tested their system with a single subject in the same room. Multiple people can be detected simultaneously, but overlapping positions can make it difficult to separate signals. “If one person is behind the other, it can be difficult to tease them apart, so for now we’re focusing on just one person in a room,” said Obraczka.

Jon Cooper noted that untangling signals from multiple people or distinguishing between humans and pets is possible, especially with help from artificial intelligence-assisted interpretation that can learn to recognize different movement patterns and sizes.

The technology also doesn’t require multiple devices. “If your cell phone can catch the Wi-Fi, we can theoretically detect the heart rate and breathing rate,” said Nayan Sanjay Bhatia, PhD student at UC Santa Cruz on Obraczka’s team. However, Bhatia noted that not all vendors provide access to router code, so researchers use their own devices, which cost around $10 per unit, according to Obraczka.

Of course, significant hurdles remain before Wi-Fi-based monitoring becomes clinical reality, including trials to prove that it has the precision of medical-grade devices. It can struggle with multiple people in the same space and raises privacy concerns about continuous surveillance. Questions about data security, consent, and the potential for misuse need careful consideration before widespread deployment.

“While still in its early stages, this innovation points to a future where we can measure vital signs easily, without the need for wearables or specialized equipment,” said Yang.”  Source

Related

Western Colleges Help Build China’s Digital Dragnet With Taxpayer Funds, Study Warns

WHO–Gates Unveils Blueprint For Global Digital ID, AI-Driven Surveillance, & Life-Long Vaccine Tracking For Everyone

Trump signs order targeting ‘cumbersome’ state AI regulation

The Internet of Bodies ( IoB )

Sovereignty Begins in The Mind – Ethical Governance for Protecting Cognitive Liberty

‘‘Management of Individuals’ Neural Data Act of 2025’’

Trump Moves To Strip States’ Control Over AI and Wireless

Radiation Is Defined As Pollution

OPPOSE H.R. 2289 — Antennas Everywhere

Internet of Brains

Cognitive Warfare The 21st-Century Game Changer