As a result of Operation Paperclip, Dr. Wernher von Braun was among the NAZI scientists, engineers, and technicians brought to the United States after World War II to lead the NASA space program.
For decades NASA has had a huge budget without any meaningful environmental safety regulations, public oversight, or accountability for the results of their experimentation.
The 1979 report below describes NASA experimentation involving the stratospheric sulfate aerosol layer. Analysis includes study of carbonyl sulfide and sulfur dioxide aerosol particles.
“…there is concern that anthropogenic perturbations of the layer due to increased sulfur loading of the stratosphere or the injection of particulate matter at high altitudes could possibly affect the climate…”
OSTP. (2023). Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification. Office of Science and Technology Policy, Washington, DC, USA.
“NOAA and NASA are cooperating on sampling the lower stratospheric aerosol layer in the Stratospheric Aerosol processes, Budget and Radiative Effects (SABRE) mission using the NASA WB-57 high-altitude research aircraft.” p.43
May 4, 2024 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | How’s the weather? | Image Source: H.R. 6093, the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act | As nearly a dozen States have started taking legislative action to prohibit weather manipulation, the federal government and other U.S. states are continuing decades of weather experiments. Colorado HB 1435 provides millions of dollars for weather modification programs. 29 states and Washington, D.C. have policies which allow for weather modification experimentation.
It is notable that western states that have long standing artificial “weather” experimentation programs have experienced the worst drought, flooding, and catastrophic fires.
Keep in mind that in 1961 JFK promoted United Nations world government, weather control (geoengineering), and the use of satellites, which function now as overarching architecture of a globalist digital prison (AI/5G). Weather engineering systems, branded as “weather research” utilize networks of interoperable ground-based, airborne, and space-based facilities.
“…the particular danger of environmental warfare lies in the possibility that the aggressor nation may be secretly, over the course of many years, employing any of a whole arsenal of hostile geophysical techniques against another nation which would be unaware of the origin of the “natural” disasters afflicting her and thus incapable of initiating any counteraction.” p.92
The “Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX)” has a budget appropriations of $20,000,000 in H.R. 6093. Other areas of focus for federal experimental weather schemes include appropriations for atmospheric research, water management, hurricane, tsunami, flooding, and storms. Satellites and data collection are an integral part of weather management, compartmentalized under NESDIS. Partnerships and data transfers are also mentioned without providing specific entities.
H.R. 6093 is the reauthorization of The Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017, H.R. 353, enacted by the Trump administration to improve coordination of the U.S. weather enterprise.
H.R. 6093, the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act is rooted upon H.R. 2130, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Authorization Act of 1992, authorizing “appropriations to the Secretary of Commerce for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for: (1) National Weather Service operations and research; (2) certain public warning and weather forecast systems and programs; (3) climate and air quality research, including climate and global changes; (4) atmospheric research; and (5) satellite observing systems.”
H.R. 6093 Summary :“To improve the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s weather research, support improvements in weather forecasting and prediction, expand commercial opportunities for the provision of weather data, and for other purposes.”
“In April of 2017, the President signed into law the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act (Public Law No. 115-25, Title IV, sec. 402, 15 U.S.C. § 8542 – link takes you to a non-icams-portal.gov website). The Act required the Director of The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to establish an Interagency Committee for Advancing Weather Services – ICAMS meets this requirement. As indicated in the Act, ICAMS will serve “to improve coordination of relevant weather research and forecast innovation activities across the Federal Government.”” Link to ICAMS HERE
Readers may notice the lack of funding or coordination for “geoengineering” programs.
Sophisticated branding such as “weather research” allows a never-ending revenue stream to continue flowing for atmospheric experiments or “other purposes,” avoiding public opposition to weather control and legislative measures to prohibit environmental manipulation at State and National levels.
The Need For A Climate Control Study Program CIA 1960 Report:
“Technological developments of the past two decades have provided the understanding, the techniques, and the means necessary for an assault on the problems of climate control. Control of any kind requires capabilities in all these areas. Meteorology is just now beginning to acquire such capabilities.” LINK
March 26, 2024 | Image source | An interesting 2021 study explores links between Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) exposure, CV19 and other diseases.
“Effect of Coronavirus Worldwide through Misusing of Wireless Sensor Networks,” was published in the American Journal of Bioinformatics Research. Authors studied impacts of exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices, networks and sensors concluding, “Corona is a sensory technical virus to spread as a non-communicable disease in animals and human beings. This virus is not biological, it is spread by technological programming and remote sensing.”
The abstract states: “…The study aims to evaluate the maltreating of wireless sensor networks that affect individuals within the body boundary area. Wireless sensor data were collected from individual’s profile, diagnosis and sensor node records at laboratory experiments. The study shows the effect of processed sensor nodes among individual’s body organs to compare with the existing environments. The study illustrates all individuals suffer from sensor disease due to reflecting of wavered sensors at open eyes sights with high speed electromagnetic-radio tracking systems…”
RFR has crept up on humanity. If we follow the marketing for new devices and services there’s no mention of the harms of RFR exposure. If we follow military weapons research and development, it’s clear that RFR is a weapon.
1975 DARPA report, “Soviet Developments in Weather Modification, Climate Modification, and Climatology:” Potential geophysical warfare techniques: “the creation of ‘windows” in the atmospheric ozone layer; the hostile deployment of ultra- and infra-acoustic fields; the manipulation of atmospheric electricity to depress the mental activity of large groups of people…”
The installation of a sophisticated surveillance system built with RFR-transmitting infrastructure inclusive of satellite networks and interoperable ground based instruments that are continuously polluting the environment with RFR has been termed the “digital prison.”
The federal government in partnership with the UN is not capable of reigning in the problem because the federal government is funding these activities.
November 15, 2023 | Image credit: NASA | As a result of Operation Paperclip, Dr. Wernher von Braun was among the NAZI scientists and engineers brought to the United States to lead the NASA space program. For decades NASA has had a huge budget without public oversight or meaningful environmental safety regulations.
For example, in the hype around NASA’s Artemis Missions, very little discussion happens regarding how much air pollution is released by rockets.
With the non-stop marketing of zero “emissions,” somehow the biggest polluters of all, rockets, aviation, and wireless infrastructure are exempt from meaningful regulatory standards to prevent hazardous pollution in order to protect people and our environment.
How Much Do Rockets Pollute? Are They Bad For Our Air?
H20 (big white cloud from the water-cooling system at the launch pad)
CO2
CARBON SOOT
CARBON MONOXIDE
CHLORINE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN NITROGENNITROGEN
ALUMINIA
SULFURIC COMPOUNDS
AND
many other TRACE GASES claimed to be “insignificant”.
Types of rocket fuel
RP-1 often mixed with liquid Oxygen- highly refined jet fuel – or kerosene
Methane
Hydrogen
solid rocket fuel
hypergolic fuel
SOLID ROCKET BOOSTERS (SRB) are the most polluting in first stage of launch
SRB made from:
Hydrochloric Acid
Ammonium
Perchlorates
Salt of Perchloric Acids
Ammonia
Aluminum or Magnesium Powder
booster oxidizers HTPB and PBAN
Aluminum oxide
Soot
CO2
Hydrogen Chloride
Nitrogen Oxides
Hydrogen
Trace gases
Emissions regulations placed on the automotive industry are necessary to protect health and the environment but are worthless without similar pollution preventing requirements also applied to rockets, aircraft, and radiation transmissions from satellites.
The article below discusses environmental impacts of rockets while perpetuating the hypothesis regarding demonized greenhouse gases. Water vapor, ((a greenhouse gas)) emitted by rockets and other emitters in the aviation sector are not included in the pollution equation underscoring the contradiction and inaccuracy of climate models.
The paper states: “These findings should be understood by those with responsibility for preventing or responding to the consequences of bioterrorist attacks.”
In 1961 President Eisenhower warned:
“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present-and is gravely to be regarded…
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”
Laws to prohibit the release of aerosols and other hazardous contaminants in Earth’s atmosphere and environment are urgently needed to protect all biological life.
J.P.G. Van Leuken, A.N. Swart, A.H. Havelaar, A. Van Pul, W. Van der Hoek, D. Heederik, Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock – A review to inform risk assessment studies, Microbial Risk Analysis, Volume 1, 2016, Pages 19-39, ISSN 2352-3522, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2015.07.002.
Abstract
In this review we discuss studies that applied atmospheric dispersion models (ADM) to bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock in the context of risk assessment studies. Traditionally, ADMs have been developed to describe the atmospheric transport of chemical pollutants, radioactive matter, dust, and particulate matter. However, they have also enabled researchers to simulate bioaerosol dispersion.
To inform risk assessment, the aims of this review were fourfold, namely (1) to describe the most important physical processes related to ADMs and pathogen transport, (2) to discuss studies that focused on the application of ADMs to pathogenic bioaerosols, (3) to discuss emission and inactivation rate parameterisations, and (4) to discuss methods for conversion of concentrations to infection probabilities (concerning quantitative microbial risk assessment).
The studies included human, livestock, and industrial sources. Important factors for dispersion included wind speed, atmospheric stability, topographic effects, and deposition. Inactivation was mainly governed by humidity, temperature, and ultraviolet radiation.
Ray Kurzweil describes taking “some kind of medication that would have nanobots go through our bloodstream and they would find the end of the neocortex and attach themselves there and communicate outside so you could have a computer on your body but more likely you’re really in the cloud…”
"AI for Good" Summit – Geneva
I actually agree with Ray Kurzweil — smartphones are a precursor to a direct brain interface.
Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting cloud seeding and weather modification. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.
“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”-President Eisenhower, 1961
The White House has released a new report, “Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management,” outlining the plan to deploy geoengineering programs, that are being framed as “research”.
The schemes involve the intentional release of chemical aerosols to block sunlight from reaching the Earth. The document acknowledges harmful potential consequences of deliberately contaminating the air, such as increased public exposure to particulate matter and toxic air pollution, psychological impacts, changes in the color of the sky, precipitation reduction, reduction of crop yields, and other “known unknowns.”
This report is an attempt seeking to legitimize geoengineering, a form of environmental warfare involvingdeliberate poisoning of the air and blocking the sunlight. The public does not consent to geoengineering.
Link To 2013 Video -Geoengineering-David-Keith: “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”
Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting cloud seeding and weather modification. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.
June 27, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | The Congressional Research Service published a report in May of this year which outlines various geoengineering methods, including stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), marine cloud brightening (MCB), and cirrus cloud thinning (CCT). Policymakers are interested establishing a governance framework for solar geoengineering (SG).
According to the paper, “The 117th Congress appropriated funds for FY2022 for activities related to SG in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022…These included the preparation of a report by the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) in conjunction with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Science Foundation (NSF)…Further, under this legislation OSTP, working with NOAA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the Department of Energy (DOE), is tasked to form an interagency working group to manage SG risk and research and to develop a governance framework for publicly funded SG research.”
In addition to acknowledging likely transboundary effects, the report cites the potential for SAI to reduce precipitation as well as potentially having a damaging effect on stratospheric ozone.
Omitted from the report is Mexico’s ban on Solar Geoengineering, health hazards, and the lack of informed public consent for weather and climate modification.
May 8, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com (ZG)| Geoengineering Monitor has compiled an interactive map providing information on past and present geoengineering programs. Main categories include weather modification, solar radiation management, and greenhouse gas removal.
One thing that all these programs have in common is there is no public consent for the activities.
In the US, geoengineering programs are coordinated and funded through various federal agencies such as National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Energy (DOE), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Department of Commerce (DOC), Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM), and others.
One of the geoengineering programs documented on the map is known as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), ongoing in the State of Washington, led by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).
In addition to federal geoengineering programs, many USA states allow weather modification, cloud seeding, and other atmospheric testing schemes – many programs happening for over 70 years:
In a 1961 speech at the UN, JFK stated, “We propose further cooperative efforts between all nations in weather prediction and eventually in weather control.”
There is precedent for prohibiting weather control programs. Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia banned or restricted cloud seeding in the 1960’s. These laws can be reenacted at the state and national level today.
1980 NASA document provides a detailed description of a Stratospheric Aerosol Modification program designed to release tons of Sulfur Dioxide and other hazardous emissions into the atmosphere with the intention of changing the climate.
NASA and collaborating agencies CIA and DOD lack critical public oversight and scrutiny which is one reason why Geoengineering [environmental warfare] has occurred for decades and continues with zero regulations.
“So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision.” Link To_ David Keith_2013
December 1, 1973 | Report for National Aeronautics and Space Administration ( NASA ) | Washington, D.C. |
ABSTRACT
Barium and lithium vapors were released from sounding rockets in the thermosphere and observed from aboard the NASA Convair 990 at an altitude of 40,000 ft. The purpose of the releases were to (1) check out observational and operational procedures associated with the large high altitude barium release from a Scout rocket (BIC); (2) develop an all-weather technique for observing chemical releases; (3) evaluate methods of observing daytime releases, and (4) investigate the possibilities of observations from a manned satellite.
One of the pioneers of NASA was Dr. Wernher von Braun, who was a member of the Nazi Party and an SS officer. For fifteen years after World War II, Von Braun worked with the U.S. Army in the development of ballistic missiles. As part of a military operation called Operation Paperclip, he and an initial group of about 125 were sent to America. Dr. von Braun eventually became director of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center.
Link To Source 
