5 January 2025 | Zero5G.com | ZeroNotification.com | Image source | Current regulatory guidelines for satellite radiation (and ground based infrastructure) are not intended to protect Life on Earth, but rather to protect radiofrequency radiation transmissions from interference.
Research Study: Starlink Satellites Spewing Radiation
Findings published in a study by the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics on second generation V2-mini Starlink satellites found 32 times more radiation than the first generation. The authors characterize the electromagnetic radiation as “unintended” as if radiation emissions are not inherent properties of the design.
Bassa, C. G., et al.: A&A, 689, L10 (2024) “…we find that the second-generation satellites emit UEMR that is up to a factor of 32 stronger compared to the first generation. The calculated electric field strengths of the detected UEMR exceed typical electromagnetic compatibility standards used for commercial electronic devices as well as recommended emission thresholds from the Radiocommunication Sector of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU-R) aimed at protecting the 150.05–153 MHz frequency range allocated to radio astronomy.”
October 5, 2020 VT Digger Commentary
By Mark Alexander: Starlink is the wrong path to broadband [Excerpts]:
“Compared with fiber to the home, Starlink (and 5G in general) is hugely inefficient. It requires the launching of hundreds of polluting, kerosene-powered rockets. The satellites themselves have a limited lifespan of approximately five to seven years, after which time they must be sent back to earth as flaming space junk. Even the earliest crop of Starlink satellites are already obsolete. The ground stations and home terminals themselves are also power-hungry devices, since they must be able to transmit microwaves to satellites that are over 300 miles away. Is this the kind of technology we want to use if we’re truly interested in reducing our energy consumption?”
Regarding the “big picture” of satellite deployment attorney Julian Gresser stated in 2023, “We must remember that this wireless infrastructure is intended to facilitate invasions of privacy, and government and corporate surveillance, in violation at a practical level of numerous state laws protecting consumer privacy. It will authorize intrusion and eliminate protection of your own home, in violation of the fourth and ninth amendments. It will enable massive searches, and indeed assaults, of millions of people in their homes, without their owners’ informed consent.” -p.12
“But nonetheless, the same provisions we’re seeing at the local level are being implemented for satellites. And there’s a reason why. Because satellites are being closely integrated with terrestrial industrial infrastructure.” p.13
Related
China exploits fleet of U.S. satellites to strengthen police and military power
BlackSky Next-Generation Monitoring Satellites Will Have 50cm Resolution
2020 GAO 5G Wireless Report Outlines Role of United Nations and China in Setting Global Standards
Globalist Financial Control Apparatus Embedded in Department of Commerce Orbit
NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE PRESIDENT’S 2025 BUDGET