
30 October 2024 | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com | Response to Critics of Lee and Broudy 2024 on the Toxicity and Self-Assembling Technology in Incubated Samples of Injectable mRNA Materials. (2024). International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 3(2), 1244.20-1244.29. https://doi.org/10.56098/aqgzye36
Professor Ian Akyildiz, pioneer of the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT), pointed out in an advanced technology symposium in 2023:



Abstract
Our article “Real-Time Self-Assembly . . . ” (Lee & Broudy, 2024) published in this journal has attracted attention from scholars, commentators, and professional fact-checkers from around the world, most of it featuring generous praise and some of it impassioned pleas for its authors to stick to their own areas of expertise. Our reply to the critics of this study is an attempt to address and accommodate scholarly critique and answer other concerns about our perceived lack of know-how to engage in such research. In this response, we suggest that a reflexive and singular focus on the declared components of the COVID injectables represents a bias of its own, and a lack of due diligence on our critics’ part. The “Nano–Bio–Info–Cogno (NBIC)” era of the 21st century (see Jamali et al., 2018) is an already very well-documented development (Cevallos et al., 2022; The White House, 2022), and our aim is to urge scholars to enlarge the critical lens they use to assess these phenomena. This broadening of perspective has direct bearing on science and scholarship, direct implications for the status of legacy biosciences, and requires inclusion in any explanatory framework, which we discuss briefly in this reply.
Related
Research Study Finds Self-Assembling Nanobots in CV19 Injectables
Nanobots, Construction process of Microchips in C19 injectables
Design of Wireless Nanosensor Networks for Intrabody Application

Further Reading
PDF Internet of Bio-Nano Things 2021 UN ITU
6G: The Intelligent Network of Everything